The first piece I chose was "Broken Rainbow" by Chia-Chien Mai. Mai’s piece is a statement on caged animals and how they are prisoners. It explores perhaps what an animal may feel while it’s in captivity, and also delves into its imagination. I don’t believe there was necessarily a brand or company behind the piece, but rather an artist with a belief in animal rights. The demographic for this piece is perhaps college-aged males and females and older who understand the issue of animal rights and are able to infer the statement about it. Though the piece is childlike in style, the subject matter is a bit too complex for younger audiences. Mai is using a light-hearted and childlike approach to a serious subject as if to draw further attention to it. The piece is almost comical in nature whilst being somewhat sadistic. I believe Mai used the cartoon approach in order to highlight the fact that a lot of people don’t take animal rights seriously, despite them being a serious issue. The motion piece is made both out of still images and live action ones; but mostly illustrations. It’s very cartoon-like and has a lot of texture.
The piece is memorable because it is such juxtaposition. It is a serious and strong message but the piece is so lighthearted on the outside. It reminds me of Happy Tree Friends – the characters and animation are reminiscent of children’s cartoons but the actual cartoons themselves are horribly violent. I think that this contrast helps convey the difficulty that animal rights activists have in being taken seriously sometimes. I think the judges chose Mai’s piece as a winner because not only is it beautifully done, but it is a creative way to convey a message. To use irony takes skill, and to do it so well deserves recognition.
For my second piece, I chose "Flowerpots" by Rafael Sommerhalder.
I believe that Sommerhalder’s piece is about how people neglect to embrace their freedom when they have it and instead stick to their habits and “norms”. There is no brand or company behind the piece other than Rafael Sommerhalder. The demographic for this piece could be anyone; since it represents the universal ideas of freedom and individuality, anyone from children to adults could enjoy it. However, in order to get the deeper meaning, one may possibly have to be of an older demographic.
The piece is very simplistic yet conveys a fairly complex idea. The man in the flowerpot symbolizes people who are afraid to stray from their roots and experience new things, and in turn “drown”. The fear of complete freedom is a primitive fear; as societal beings we are afraid to stray from what is expected a lot of the time, and we are also habitual creatures. Therefore, the simplistic drawings reflect the primal simplicity of habit and society, and also create interest in that the meaning behind the drawings is deeper than a surface cartoon. This piece is memorable because it is profound yet simplistic. All it took was a simple line drawing to convey the message. I think that the metaphor of a person in a flowerpot is fairly profound and entices the imagination. I believe the judges recognized this, and paired with the simplicity of the piece, found it to be a winner.